Skip to content

Big-Bang in Practice: Antifragility, Innovation and Leadership

March 24, 2013

rethinking teamwork This is one of the more challenging posts I’ve conceived, mainly because I’ve attempted to weave together several seemingly diverse ideas and trends into one composite post.

As with much of my blogging over the past four-plus years, my approach has been to integrate what may at first appear to be unrelated events and concepts. However, we live in an inter-connected world, full of uncertainty, unpredictability and constant turmoil. I hope this post spurs your thinking and imagination. And as always, I welcome your personal insights.

Here we go!

We’ve become pretty accustomed to the daily deluge of incremental news bits about technological improvements to Apple’s products, some whiz bang release of a new Samsung smart phone or the acquisition of a small, upstart company by a giant multinational.

Is that real innovation?

Think back to Toyota which slowly but surely built its brand and reputation by adhering to the advice of quality and measurement guru W. Edwards Deming. In more recent years, look at Hyundai’s and Kia’s incredible growth. Or Lenovo’s rise (which purchased IBM’s Think Pad several years ago).

As much as Toyota and Hyundai should be respected for their sustained commitment to improvement, innovation is much more than this. It’s easy to get caught up in the media hoopla about new digital platforms (aka the iPhone or Android), passed off as a big-bang disruption. Think back to (or read up on) the introduction of the internal combustion engine, the telephone, penicillin, or space flight. To put it in the vernacular, that was serious innovation that disrupted society for the better.

Kelly In his brilliant book What Technology Wants” Kevin Kelly (who helped launched Wired magazine) notes that some of the major inventions and discoveries of the past actually were being worked on independently by different inventors. Here are some examples:

1) Theory of Evolution:
Yes, Charles Darwin gets the credit, but how people know that Alfred Russel Wallace developed the theory at the same time. Indeed, both men drew their inspiration from Thomas Malthus’s book on population growth.

2) The Telephone:
Alexander Bell received the accolades for this invention, yet Elisha Gray applied for the patent on the same day as Bell, February 14, 1876.

3) Sunspots, the Thermometer and the hypodermic Needle:
Galileo wasn’t the only person to discover sunspots (1611); three others also found them. Six inventors independently created the thermometer, and three invented the hypodermic needle.

Inventing and innovating are not done in isolation. While they may seem to follow a sequence of development, similar to organisms, as noted by Kelly, there are plenty of instances where inventions burst forth into society. And what is so striking from this process is that many people are actively involved simultaneously, though often independently.

Check out this TED talk with Kelly where he talks about how technology evolves.

Too much emphasis has been directed in the recent past towards incremental innovation. What propels economies and societies forward is innovation that eliminates the old and welcomes in the radically new–disruptive innovation.

Enter Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter, father of creative destruction as the impetus to creativity and innovation. As much as he was a weirdo, Schumpeter was viewed as the pre-eminent person on innovation’s role in the force underlying capitalism and economic progress. Creative destruction sounds scary but it’s what keeps our standard of living and quality of life improving. Snuff it out and society stands still.

How many of you would prefer to be writing long-hand instead of having the luxury of digitally erasing text you’ve just typed? How about maneuvering a horse-drawn buggy through manure-covered streets under gas-fired lamps? Or how about running to the out-house in the middle of the night for a mid-night pee? Yeah, indoor plumbing rocks.

You get my point.

Serious innovation is about destroying the old and introducing the new, while at the same time disrupting our mental models (our personal assumptions that affect how we see the world).

Recent incremental technology changes will eventually produce disruptive upheavals in the labor market and more generally within society. However, that shouldn’t be interpreted as being harmful. We have to shape what happens to benefit us collectively and individually. And to be successful in achieving this demands personal leadership. Each of us must learn how to adapt to and how to thrive in a world of unrelenting change.

Fragile Meet Nicholas Taleb, author of the best-seller The Black Swan and his newest book Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder.

Taleb’s a bit of an oddball. But the guy’s brilliant and deep in his thinking about societal and economic effects resulting from change events. Antifragile, while not the lightest of reading, contains some really important insights on how people can strengthen their adaptability to change. Taleb uses the term “Fragilista” as someone who is fragile and non-adaptive. An “Antifragilista” is an individual who is able to quickly adjust to unpredictable events. Here are a few of Taleb’s thoughts:

You get pseudo-order when you seek order; you only get a measure of order and control when you embrace randomness.

Complex systems are full of interdependencies–hard to detect–and nonlinear responses.

Man-made complex systems tend to develop cascades and runaway chains of reactions that decrease, even eliminate, predictability and cause outsized events.

An annoying aspect of the Black Swan problem… is that the odds of rare events are simply not computable. We know a lot less about hundred-year floods than five-year floods.

Antifragility is not just the anti-dote to the Black Swan; understanding it makes us less intellectually fearful in accepting the role of these events as necessary for history, technology; knowledge, everything.

We didn’t get where we are today thanks to policy makes–but thanks to the appetite for risks and errors of a certain class of people we need to encourage, protect, and respect.

This last statement by Taleb is aimed at entrepreneurs and inventors, people who create jobs and who contribute to our collective standard of living by bringing new products and services to us. These risk-takers thrive in the face of adversity, getting up immediately when they fall down due to failure to move forwards. They don’t look back at failure but instead seek out and take advantage of new opportunities, which often appear hazy and highly uncertain.

I encourage you to check out Taleb’s book Antifragile for many more insights and perspectives.

My concluding comment to you is don’t get blindsided by a new competitor in your field or by an unexpected event. Learn how to anticipate the unknown and how to thrive in a world of unknown unknowns. Become an anti-fragilista and a true innovator.

Be sure to leave a comment!


The longer one goes without market trauma, the worse the damage when commotion occurs.

– Nassim Nichilas Taleb


Intergen ebook cover with TextClick here to download my new complimentary e-book Leadership and the Inter-Generational Divide, 2nd Edition.


Visit my e-Books, Resources and Services pages.

Twitter PicTake a moment to meet Jim.

About these ads
2 Comments leave one →
  1. April 1, 2013 12:51 pm

    Thanks for taking the time, RK, to stop by my site and adding to the conversation.

  2. April 1, 2013 5:43 am

    So, in the end, you (along with Nicholas Taleb) have reached to the lasting notion of :

    “…………………..but thanks to the appetite for risks and errors of a certain class of people we need to encourage, protect, and respect.”

    Every single time, when the thread of EXCELLENCE & BRILLIANCE has been reverse-engineered, A certain class of people have been found in the background………….YES, THIS IS A CERTAIN CLASS of people.

    BUT the identification of this CLASS among hordes of employees, managers and leaders has never been easier. In GE’s terminology, they are called ‘Diamonds’…..and indeed they know as well that such ‘Diamonds’ might uselessly be lying in rough…….and they make a point of identifying them. Thus they have developed the philosophy and mechanisms to identify such diamonds in the rough.

    Until & unless, good companies don’t learn the beliefs & practices for identification of this class of employees…………………………….they can’t even think of encouraging, protecting, and respecting them.

    With thanks,

    RK

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 124 other followers

%d bloggers like this: